Raymond Pointcarr said "believing or believing nothing are two simple solutions that have a lot to think about."
In the world as it goes, it seems to me that we cannot afford to sentient by ignoring what is happening. nevertheless the guidance will never have been correspondingly perverted.
I allow you here some keys from my personal postscript to avoid getting too easily deceived, here is first of all some evidence ...
We're watching you.
Of course this is on your own my opinion, but I imagine that anything you pull off upon the Internet to attempt to maintain your anonymity, it is missed! Unless you are a wise expert, your Sioux wiles will deceive you. Anonymous browsing, foreign mail box ... in my opinion, none of this prevents a processing dispensation from having admission to all the assistance you put online and to every the sites you visit.
The money, the scarcity of the liquid is not a coincidence. mammal often in Italy, I appreciate their relationship to cash and their defiance towards banking networks; A lot of transactions are over and done with in cash, and I find it reassuring. afterward you are deprived of cash, all you spend upon the penny, where and how, will be totally suitably accessible by the authorities
Cars, vehicles are registered. There are many systems on the promote dedicated to the reading of your license plates and the acceptance of the characters. in view of that we can technically know where and later than you went; These systems can along with give images of you and your potential passengers. To near the loop, there are in addition to the renowned "connected cars" that can tell a lot about your activities.
Finally, there are ultra far along cell phones. They may be skillful to hint you. A minima once they are in operation, they indicate upon which cell network you are connected, and as soon as you switch from one network to another.
"Information", we are not hiding anything: in France we have a centralised guidance system, Agence France Presse, which centralizes and writes the basic articles. In addition, there are investigations that can be carried out by more or less independent journalists. It has been seen on many occasions that necessary guidance may be held in silence (treatment of the Chernobyl crisis, cancer of the President of the Republic Mitterrand ...) and, on the other, there are smoothly orchestrated leaks of sensible elements to the inscrutability of instructions or vagueness of defence.
So we see that the assistance is processed and controlled for what it is, which is a strategic element.
Of course, censorship according to the Stalinist model does not exist in our latitudes, the principle of mistreat of guidance is much more evolved and subtle.
The first principle, which dates from the Second World War, is to drown the unconditional below an ocean of lies. Rather than helpfully hiding a heartwarming truth, it is more operational to drown it in a flood of unnecessary news while maddening to discredit it, because taking into consideration guidance is discredited, there is approximately nothing to distress Of flight or of revelations, one can not flavor what is already public!
For this there is a formidable weapon. in the manner of our hurting opinion is classified as "conspiracy theory", there is nearly no unintentional of it mammal taken seriously.
The second principle is rehabilitation. The stuffing of skull or brainwashing is insidiously done, hours of daylight after day; You insinuate ideas, values or fears in you by extremely committed means.
Of course there is the unchanging rewriting of history, recent or old, I axiom that we had recently lost our ancestors the Gauls to the improvement of various and varied ancestors probably "derived from diversity" and hastily much more presentable.
There are plus more insidious, more discreet methods that take over the politico-media sphere and, through contamination, that we end up finding in the common language. For example, concept words are ready-made words or phrases, "ready to think" that are found in any process of brainwashing. Here are some examples:
In the eternal we have "facho". Stalin said, "If you pull off not adore someone, treat him as a fascist, even though he exculpates himself he does not pull off everything else ..."
In everlasting we furthermore have "reac". It's simple, it does not purpose much, it's perfect.
I can not fail to quotation the stainless "paranoia", a remarkable weapon of addition destruction. From the moment you have managed to label your enemy "paranoid", all he can say, do, every the evidence he can bring will be considered null!
In more recent establishment we have "nauseous". It does not bind anything and allied like the "dark hours of our history" it always hurts ... One of the last finds that is extremely affluent at the moment is "populist". If you are not a plus system, you are necessarily "populist"; It's awesome !
It is fascinating to look these expressions bloom one morning and later spread, repeatedly picked going on by the media to orders. later we quickly end by hearing them everywhere, by contamination.
Of course, we can affix them to make phrases "rich in meaning", for example: this facho reac has become certainly paranoid, it is serious! Or, it's a nauseating article that reminds us of the dark hours of our history ...
You can have fun at house during long winter evenings to make combinations; You will see, it works every time!
But over the joke, tiny by little, you will be more vigilant, you spot those little scams that lurk in correspondingly many press articles, and that one hears regularly in speeches. This is a first step towards "mine clearance".
After the words concepts, there are the taboo words, the pronounce. One of the most lovely examples is "Daech", a barbarism invented for not having to find "Islamist".
There is then "immigrant" become unpronounceable, replaced by the unconditionally advantageous "migrants" that usually applies to birds. It should be noted that this ventilation posed a problem to a famous sports shop which had renewed as all year its promotion in favor of its cartridges for hunting for migrants ...
A few years ago a minister next tried to ban the word "civilization" by arguing that this aeration was used most often abandoned to brimer the peoples "from diversity (word concept)".
The words pronounce are innumerable: blind, deaf, black, sweeper, etc. They are usually replaced by more or less ridiculous expressions: blind, black, beur, surface technician ... The question that must be asked is why correspondingly many taboo words? Why are words that have meaning and that have been in dictionaries for decades or even centuries rudely become pronounce? is a scanner less credited or less paid than a surface technician?
In fact the common point of the consider is the fact that our "self-righteous" charity communicates in falsehood and fittingly cannot or does not desire to apprehend distinct realities.
Here too, we can have fun finding the more or less ridiculous expressions that bloom in the press articles, it is substitute step towards demining.
Slander, there will always be something left ...
One of the worst methods used by the system is the legal-media suspicion. Today, an indictment is worth condemnation, which of course amounts to a conviction without evidence and generally without cause, what matters next the decision of "justice" the intention and reached, the enemy is eliminated.
The mere rumor can also, if properly disseminated, suit as truth, even if it is vanguard denied, but the evil is done, the take aim is reached.
So say me how to locate out? How can we avoid monster tainted by the bulk of propaganda though maddening to save a global vision of what is up in the world and in our country?
It is not simple, but there are some solutions. In the first place, it is critical to avoid newscasts and news channels where the rapidity of presentation of actions makes a decryption "on the go" definitely complicated, and where one ends happening living thing carried away by the flood of nonsense .
The written press is the solution, but here too, you have to be careful. One would easily tend to admission forlorn the press that corresponds to our diplomatic orientation, it is not enough! The ideal is to see at a panel of two or three sources, to attempt to understand the instruction and especially to ask the question of the reliability of the info and the possibility of manipulation.
With a bit of training we get to share things and understand a tiny the activities that shake our world. Obviously, one never gets a perfect and sure knowledge of the deeds of this world, the dream is to attempt to know sufficient to comprehend what is up in the main lines.
Another interesting method is to search for guidance upon search engines (BING, GOOGLE, etc.). Even if all is far-off from monster objective, you can acquire a glimpse of what is taking place in the world, because nothing is Hidden, the real numbers are accessible if you see for them a little.
For example, see for figures on world population growth, oil consumption, percentage of renewable computer graphics by country, look at agri-food data. in addition to look at the per capita ecological footprint calculations made by each and everyone, bring that help to the population buildup figures ... If you've never finished that, afterward you've ended that, you'll have substitute Reading the world I can guarantee it!
For a democracy to work, citizens should be skillfully informed. We look every day that one is far and wide from the account, and that all this is unaccompanied facade.
Finally, for those who would like to deepen the subject, I recommend some readings:
"Life and death of the image" by Rgis Debray
"The Sign" and "The retrieve work" by Umberto Eco
"The good Circus" and above every "lived history" (one cannot understand the second without having right of entry the first) of Pierre Claustermann
There are many others of course, these are just a few books I think of; They are not politically connotations and allow everyone in their artifice to comprehend a tiny bigger the world around us ...
 |
| Raymond Pointcarr |
In the world as it goes, it seems to me that we cannot afford to sentient by ignoring what is happening. nevertheless the guidance will never have been correspondingly perverted.
I allow you here some keys from my personal postscript to avoid getting too easily deceived, here is first of all some evidence ...
We're watching you.
Of course this is on your own my opinion, but I imagine that anything you pull off upon the Internet to attempt to maintain your anonymity, it is missed! Unless you are a wise expert, your Sioux wiles will deceive you. Anonymous browsing, foreign mail box ... in my opinion, none of this prevents a processing dispensation from having admission to all the assistance you put online and to every the sites you visit.
The money, the scarcity of the liquid is not a coincidence. mammal often in Italy, I appreciate their relationship to cash and their defiance towards banking networks; A lot of transactions are over and done with in cash, and I find it reassuring. afterward you are deprived of cash, all you spend upon the penny, where and how, will be totally suitably accessible by the authorities
Cars, vehicles are registered. There are many systems on the promote dedicated to the reading of your license plates and the acceptance of the characters. in view of that we can technically know where and later than you went; These systems can along with give images of you and your potential passengers. To near the loop, there are in addition to the renowned "connected cars" that can tell a lot about your activities.
Finally, there are ultra far along cell phones. They may be skillful to hint you. A minima once they are in operation, they indicate upon which cell network you are connected, and as soon as you switch from one network to another.
"Information", we are not hiding anything: in France we have a centralised guidance system, Agence France Presse, which centralizes and writes the basic articles. In addition, there are investigations that can be carried out by more or less independent journalists. It has been seen on many occasions that necessary guidance may be held in silence (treatment of the Chernobyl crisis, cancer of the President of the Republic Mitterrand ...) and, on the other, there are smoothly orchestrated leaks of sensible elements to the inscrutability of instructions or vagueness of defence.
So we see that the assistance is processed and controlled for what it is, which is a strategic element.
Of course, censorship according to the Stalinist model does not exist in our latitudes, the principle of mistreat of guidance is much more evolved and subtle.
The first principle, which dates from the Second World War, is to drown the unconditional below an ocean of lies. Rather than helpfully hiding a heartwarming truth, it is more operational to drown it in a flood of unnecessary news while maddening to discredit it, because taking into consideration guidance is discredited, there is approximately nothing to distress Of flight or of revelations, one can not flavor what is already public!
For this there is a formidable weapon. in the manner of our hurting opinion is classified as "conspiracy theory", there is nearly no unintentional of it mammal taken seriously.
The second principle is rehabilitation. The stuffing of skull or brainwashing is insidiously done, hours of daylight after day; You insinuate ideas, values or fears in you by extremely committed means.
Of course there is the unchanging rewriting of history, recent or old, I axiom that we had recently lost our ancestors the Gauls to the improvement of various and varied ancestors probably "derived from diversity" and hastily much more presentable.
There are plus more insidious, more discreet methods that take over the politico-media sphere and, through contamination, that we end up finding in the common language. For example, concept words are ready-made words or phrases, "ready to think" that are found in any process of brainwashing. Here are some examples:
In the eternal we have "facho". Stalin said, "If you pull off not adore someone, treat him as a fascist, even though he exculpates himself he does not pull off everything else ..."
In everlasting we furthermore have "reac". It's simple, it does not purpose much, it's perfect.
I can not fail to quotation the stainless "paranoia", a remarkable weapon of addition destruction. From the moment you have managed to label your enemy "paranoid", all he can say, do, every the evidence he can bring will be considered null!
In more recent establishment we have "nauseous". It does not bind anything and allied like the "dark hours of our history" it always hurts ... One of the last finds that is extremely affluent at the moment is "populist". If you are not a plus system, you are necessarily "populist"; It's awesome !
It is fascinating to look these expressions bloom one morning and later spread, repeatedly picked going on by the media to orders. later we quickly end by hearing them everywhere, by contamination.
Of course, we can affix them to make phrases "rich in meaning", for example: this facho reac has become certainly paranoid, it is serious! Or, it's a nauseating article that reminds us of the dark hours of our history ...
You can have fun at house during long winter evenings to make combinations; You will see, it works every time!
But over the joke, tiny by little, you will be more vigilant, you spot those little scams that lurk in correspondingly many press articles, and that one hears regularly in speeches. This is a first step towards "mine clearance".
After the words concepts, there are the taboo words, the pronounce. One of the most lovely examples is "Daech", a barbarism invented for not having to find "Islamist".
There is then "immigrant" become unpronounceable, replaced by the unconditionally advantageous "migrants" that usually applies to birds. It should be noted that this ventilation posed a problem to a famous sports shop which had renewed as all year its promotion in favor of its cartridges for hunting for migrants ...
A few years ago a minister next tried to ban the word "civilization" by arguing that this aeration was used most often abandoned to brimer the peoples "from diversity (word concept)".
The words pronounce are innumerable: blind, deaf, black, sweeper, etc. They are usually replaced by more or less ridiculous expressions: blind, black, beur, surface technician ... The question that must be asked is why correspondingly many taboo words? Why are words that have meaning and that have been in dictionaries for decades or even centuries rudely become pronounce? is a scanner less credited or less paid than a surface technician?
In fact the common point of the consider is the fact that our "self-righteous" charity communicates in falsehood and fittingly cannot or does not desire to apprehend distinct realities.
Here too, we can have fun finding the more or less ridiculous expressions that bloom in the press articles, it is substitute step towards demining.
Slander, there will always be something left ...
One of the worst methods used by the system is the legal-media suspicion. Today, an indictment is worth condemnation, which of course amounts to a conviction without evidence and generally without cause, what matters next the decision of "justice" the intention and reached, the enemy is eliminated.
The mere rumor can also, if properly disseminated, suit as truth, even if it is vanguard denied, but the evil is done, the take aim is reached.
So say me how to locate out? How can we avoid monster tainted by the bulk of propaganda though maddening to save a global vision of what is up in the world and in our country?
It is not simple, but there are some solutions. In the first place, it is critical to avoid newscasts and news channels where the rapidity of presentation of actions makes a decryption "on the go" definitely complicated, and where one ends happening living thing carried away by the flood of nonsense .
The written press is the solution, but here too, you have to be careful. One would easily tend to admission forlorn the press that corresponds to our diplomatic orientation, it is not enough! The ideal is to see at a panel of two or three sources, to attempt to understand the instruction and especially to ask the question of the reliability of the info and the possibility of manipulation.
With a bit of training we get to share things and understand a tiny the activities that shake our world. Obviously, one never gets a perfect and sure knowledge of the deeds of this world, the dream is to attempt to know sufficient to comprehend what is up in the main lines.
Another interesting method is to search for guidance upon search engines (BING, GOOGLE, etc.). Even if all is far-off from monster objective, you can acquire a glimpse of what is taking place in the world, because nothing is Hidden, the real numbers are accessible if you see for them a little.
For example, see for figures on world population growth, oil consumption, percentage of renewable computer graphics by country, look at agri-food data. in addition to look at the per capita ecological footprint calculations made by each and everyone, bring that help to the population buildup figures ... If you've never finished that, afterward you've ended that, you'll have substitute Reading the world I can guarantee it!
For a democracy to work, citizens should be skillfully informed. We look every day that one is far and wide from the account, and that all this is unaccompanied facade.
Finally, for those who would like to deepen the subject, I recommend some readings:
 |
| Pierre Claustermann |
"Life and death of the image" by Rgis Debray
"The Sign" and "The retrieve work" by Umberto Eco
"The good Circus" and above every "lived history" (one cannot understand the second without having right of entry the first) of Pierre Claustermann
There are many others of course, these are just a few books I think of; They are not politically connotations and allow everyone in their artifice to comprehend a tiny bigger the world around us ...
